January 24, 2019, 10:45:43 AM

Author Topic: The BFG: Expanded Revised Rules Thread (MAJOR Update 04/12/2017)  (Read 87583 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Thinking Stone

  • Active Member
  • *
  • Posts: 143
    • Loc: The Great South Land of the Holy Spirit
The BFG: Expanded Revised Rules Thread (MAJOR Update 04/12/2017)
« Reply #345 on: December 31, 2018, 12:52:32 AM »
Also, one good thing about Xca|iberís BFG:XR is that he tried to keep it in the same format, so it would work well printed (and itís not too different in size from the original rules). It also incorporates all the changes directly into the text, whereas with FAQ2010 youíd have to flip pages, and itís not quite as simple to know whatís changed.

If you have the original books, then the cheapest printing option is just FAQ2010. If you didnít have the originals, then itíd be a wash between the options.

If you donít mind having electronic documents, then BFG:XR is the most convenient (though you might want to join them all into one PDF).

You could always print off single pages for important changes to refer to during games, if you didnít mind that, too.

Offline horizon

  • Moderator
  • Veteran member
  • *
  • Posts: 3849
  • Destiny Infinity Eternity
Re: The BFG: Expanded Revised Rules Thread (MAJOR Update 04/12/2017)
« Reply #346 on: December 31, 2018, 05:35:43 PM »
Good replies TS.  8)

Offline Thinking Stone

  • Active Member
  • *
  • Posts: 143
    • Loc: The Great South Land of the Holy Spirit
The BFG: Expanded Revised Rules Thread (MAJOR Update 04/12/2017)
« Reply #347 on: January 01, 2019, 01:38:49 AM »
Good replies TS.  8)
Iím glad I havenít embarrassed myself too much with my verbosity ;) :P

Incidentally, @horizon, I donít suppose you have a copy of the XR campaign rules, do you?

Also, Happy New Year from the future, everyone! (at least we can say the BFG year started off with some active discussion!)

Offline Draccan

  • Active Member
  • *
  • Posts: 175
    • Loc: Copenhagen, Denmark
Re: The BFG: Expanded Revised Rules Thread (MAJOR Update 04/12/2017)
« Reply #348 on: January 01, 2019, 06:18:49 PM »
Thanks for the replies guys. Very informative and helpful!

I do hope someone will come along with the missing pdf and share it here or in a PM!

Happy New Year!
I really would love to buy some Warmaster Kislev, Araby, Bretonnia, Vampire Counts, Chaos demons ...

Offline Thinking Stone

  • Active Member
  • *
  • Posts: 143
    • Loc: The Great South Land of the Holy Spirit
The BFG: Expanded Revised Rules Thread (MAJOR Update 04/12/2017)
« Reply #349 on: January 06, 2019, 01:55:00 PM »
I somehow overlooked Green_Squad_Leaderís thread with their completed campaign rules!

http://www.forum.specialist-arms.com/index.php?topic=8935.msg75661#msg75661

I donít know how developed this is from Xca|iberís work (until someone rescues and shares it, at least!), but this is probably the work GSL mentions earlier in this thread.

If you donít like GSLís extensions, this can always just be a good source for refits and appeals to use with the original campaign rules, too (which I think do a good job of creating that long-term fleet progression).

Offline Draccan

  • Active Member
  • *
  • Posts: 175
    • Loc: Copenhagen, Denmark
Re: The BFG: Expanded Revised Rules Thread (MAJOR Update 04/12/2017)
« Reply #350 on: January 06, 2019, 02:06:09 PM »
Thanks Thinking Stone. But I guess that still leave the missions..?
I really would love to buy some Warmaster Kislev, Araby, Bretonnia, Vampire Counts, Chaos demons ...

Offline Thinking Stone

  • Active Member
  • *
  • Posts: 143
    • Loc: The Great South Land of the Holy Spirit
The BFG: Expanded Revised Rules Thread (MAJOR Update 04/12/2017)
« Reply #351 on: January 06, 2019, 02:18:56 PM »
Thanks Thinking Stone. But I guess that still leave the missions..?
That it does, unfortunately (as Iíve realised from a second look at the document). I suspect that the rulebook/Armada missions you have would work with no trouble (I donít recall too many changes to them out of the BFG:R project, for example), and they were probably such a low priority for revision because they were designed well to begin with.

The rulebook/Armada campaign also includes the subplots charts, which GSL seems to have left out in favour of their revised system.

Nonetheless, I shall post something on the Facebook BFG page that a lot of the folks around here seem to be on, and see if there are any replies! Another possible avenue is Gothmog on here (the Additional Ships Compendium caretaker), who was working in parallel with Xca|iberís efforts.

Offline Draccan

  • Active Member
  • *
  • Posts: 175
    • Loc: Copenhagen, Denmark
Re: The BFG: Expanded Revised Rules Thread (MAJOR Update 04/12/2017)
« Reply #352 on: January 09, 2019, 10:09:44 PM »

Found someone kind enough to print the rules for me and bind them and send them to me from UK to Denmark.

I would love if someone could share the missing file with me in the next day or so!

 :)
I really would love to buy some Warmaster Kislev, Araby, Bretonnia, Vampire Counts, Chaos demons ...

Offline Fr05ty

  • Active Member
  • *
  • Posts: 39
Re: The BFG: Expanded Revised Rules Thread (MAJOR Update 04/12/2017)
« Reply #353 on: January 09, 2019, 10:25:01 PM »
In the absence of the other, perhaps more enlightened, folks interested in BFG:XR, Iíll try to provide some sensible responses! I would have tried replying earlier except that the year got away from me too quickly!

@Fro5ty: For the Dark Eldar, I presume the lack of 45 cm weapons is historical and was originally part of their playstyle intentionally. Other Eldar also lacked 45 cm weapons in the earlier lists, for example. As I understand it, Xca|iberís intent was to not substantially change lists (unless necessary), but to continue the efforts of things like BFG:R.

It might be an interesting question to ask in a new thread, to see if any of the real long-term veterans of BFG remember anything. Maybe you could try out 45 cm weapons on the grand cruiser and see how it goes?

The original Mortalis in Warp Rift 16 had the option for 45cm WB and 45cm Lances, hence my question. Additionally, the Dark Eldar in BFG:A2 are getting a battleship as well. Think I'll collate all the new ships that are being added from the game and see how they should fit into BFG:XR.

Also, someday we should fix Smotherman's formula... But that's not that important

Offline Thinking Stone

  • Active Member
  • *
  • Posts: 143
    • Loc: The Great South Land of the Holy Spirit
The BFG: Expanded Revised Rules Thread (MAJOR Update 04/12/2017)
« Reply #354 on: January 09, 2019, 11:01:44 PM »
@Draccan, I have infiltrated the BFG:XR Facebook group! From what Iíve read there, Green_Squad_Leaderís campaign rules are probably the most recent set. BFG:XRís main focus was on revising ship profiles rather than changing core rules, so I suspect there were few changes to the scenario and campaign rules.

Iíll ask to see (with hopefully a reply soonóbut I canít promise within a few days, since I donít know how responsive the group is!) if there was ever anything else.

So, worst case scenario, assuming thereís nothing else, youíd have these options: (1) add GSLís rules to your document and use those; (2) add the original campaign and scenarios section (I forget if FAQ2010 has any changes, but I think Armada does), which should fit the theme and layout); (3) keep your original books around for campaigns, and leave the scenarios/campaign rules out.

But hopefully we get a positive reply! Iíll also check the original rules, Armada, and FAQ2010 to remember whatís in there.

Offline Thinking Stone

  • Active Member
  • *
  • Posts: 143
    • Loc: The Great South Land of the Holy Spirit
The BFG: Expanded Revised Rules Thread (MAJOR Update 04/12/2017)
« Reply #355 on: January 09, 2019, 11:45:43 PM »
@fro5ty: Ah, Iíd forgotten the Warp Rift rules! Iím guessing the original cruiser rules might have influenced BFG:R (I recall seeing a Dark Eldar MMS ruleset about, but I thought Dark Eldar never moved like Eldar in the first placeÖ Iíll have to check).

Have you checked any of the BFG:Revised discussion about Dark Eldar? I forget how much there was, but there might be some thoughts about the stats there (which might explain why there arenít any 45 cm batteries).

There are some Dark Eldar players who sometimes visit, and the Facebook group is probably a good place to ask about it, too. I reckon there would be others willing to playtest that kind of change to the BFG:XR list to see if itís a necessary/useful addition, who are much more experienced with DE than me. My suspicion is that itís really a matter of how restrained oneís tastes are in limiting the fleet lists to create specific playstyles.

I think the same idea goes for new ships introduced in the video games BFG:A and BFG:A2óin a way, itís obvious that Dark Eldar will get a battleship, because every faction has a battleship for game mechanics. The background is secondary to game mechanics here, as can be seen with Chaos light cruisers and the very different implementation of escorts in BFG:A. Should Dark Eldar have a battleship? Thereís probably some background justification, though I suspect Dark Eldar probably donít need large fleet assets in the way that other fleets do. Does the Dark Eldar fleet list need a battleship? That question needs someone more experienced with playing and fighting Dark Eldar than me to answeróbut I think the real question is Ďcan the Dark Eldar list have a battleship without significantly changing the playstyle of the list?í. With restrictions like the Corsair Voidstalker, I think that kind of addition is possible.

But basically, all that waffle is to say: there are different schools of thought on what should be in fleet lists. Some people like to create heaps of interesting variants; other people prefer to create specific playstyles for fleets by restricting what they can take. BFG:XR sits pretty firmly in the second category (and since Xca|iberís not likely to come back to it soon, itíll likely stay in the second category).

However, Gothmogís Additional Ships Compendium project is designed to be exactly the sort of place for variants and new ships that didnít fit into BFG:XR! That would be the place to go with new ships from BFG:A2. The project is more active, too, so there are more people casting a critical eye over stats, and more people are likely to use new ships from it.

(ASC 2.0 Chaos Development
 https://r.tapatalk.com/shareLink?share_fid=50385&share_tid=7099&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww%2Eforum%2Especialist-arms%2Ecom%2Findex%2Ephp%3Ftopic%3D7099&share_type=t)

None of this is to say that you canít create or use new ships, or modify them to your tastesóitís just that itís unlikely theyíd be incorporated into the BFG:XR lists, whereas the ASC explicitly exists for this purpose.

================

As to the Smotherman Formula: I expect some things will never be captured well by points formulae because the nature of battles is for individual things to be subjected to unbalanced interactions, as is mentioned in the Formula. But at least one person on Facebook has mentioned a revised points formula that they use for personal projects, so maybe itís worth trying to get a hold of that one!

I think itís also good to keep in mind that a points formula never works in a vacuum: thereíre implicit assumptions about everything else in the game maintaining a certain power level. The reason itís so easy to make a points formula for BFG that actually works is because BFG is a relatively simple game with relatively simple variations between ship types (which is part of the beauty! And part of why some people are frustratingly keen on keeping fleet lists restricted!).
« Last Edit: January 09, 2019, 11:53:28 PM by Thinking Stone »

Offline Zelnik

  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 759
Re: The BFG: Expanded Revised Rules Thread (MAJOR Update 04/12/2017)
« Reply #356 on: January 16, 2019, 12:18:51 PM »
I wanted to let all of you know that you did a really great job with the rules. BFG has suffered a LOT over the years, essentially being abandoned by GW, and the promise of new minis falling rather flat (they still haven't fully revitalized Blood Bowl, though Necromunda seems to be doing pretty damn well).

You all keep this hobby going. Keep it up.