November 22, 2019, 01:56:15 AM

Poll

Should we adopt the changes listed in the first post?

Yes, make it official.
7 (50%)
No, do not make it official.
7 (50%)

Total Members Voted: 14

Voting closed: March 31, 2013, 09:00:33 PM

Author Topic: BFG:R Vote 60: Battlefleet Bakka Launch Restriction  (Read 3362 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline afterimagedan

  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 1899
    • Loc: Chicago IL, USA
BFG:R Vote 60: Battlefleet Bakka Launch Restriction
« on: March 27, 2013, 08:00:33 PM »
Add this rule to the Battlefleet Bakka fleet list:

"A Battlefleet Bakka fleet list is limited to 2 launch bays per full 500pts. If Lord Admiral Rath is taken in your fleet, you may add 2 to this total."


Offline horizon

  • Moderator
  • Veteran member
  • *
  • Posts: 3868
  • Destiny Infinity Eternity
Re: BFG:R Vote 60: Battlefleet Bakka Launch Restriction
« Reply #1 on: March 27, 2013, 08:03:47 PM »
What are the alternatives?
2 per 750? ::)

Offline afterimagedan

  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 1899
    • Loc: Chicago IL, USA
Re: BFG:R Vote 60: Battlefleet Bakka Launch Restriction
« Reply #2 on: March 27, 2013, 08:05:01 PM »
Are you thinking 2/full750??  ???

Offline horizon

  • Moderator
  • Veteran member
  • *
  • Posts: 3868
  • Destiny Infinity Eternity
Re: BFG:R Vote 60: Battlefleet Bakka Launch Restriction
« Reply #3 on: March 27, 2013, 08:06:56 PM »
It was half kidding as I know most will go by this or non-restriction, but yes 2 per 750, 4 per 1500. +2 with Rath is fine then.
But what about the Emperor then.  ;)

Offline afterimagedan

  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 1899
    • Loc: Chicago IL, USA
Re: BFG:R Vote 60: Battlefleet Bakka Launch Restriction
« Reply #4 on: March 27, 2013, 08:08:17 PM »
2/500 makes the Emperor possible with Rath at 1500.

Offline afterimagedan

  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 1899
    • Loc: Chicago IL, USA
Re: BFG:R Vote 60: Battlefleet Bakka Launch Restriction
« Reply #5 on: March 28, 2013, 06:22:54 PM »
This is how the 2/500pt rules look in my mind as far as fluff goes:
"Despite the varying but limited carrier ships in Battlefleet Bakka's retinue, they rarely come together for joint combat actions. Because of this, a Battlefleet Bakka fleet may only have 2 launch bays in their fleet per full 500pts."

Offline Jimmy Zimms

  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 420
  • Beshert is Beshert
    • Loc: World Traveler
Re: BFG:R Vote 60: Battlefleet Bakka Launch Restriction
« Reply #6 on: March 28, 2013, 07:19:11 PM »
I'm confused about the Ralth rule. He allows 4ac per 500 is present?
As we Imperials say, "The Emperor [class battleship] Protects..."

Offline afterimagedan

  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 1899
    • Loc: Chicago IL, USA
Re: BFG:R Vote 60: Battlefleet Bakka Launch Restriction
« Reply #7 on: March 28, 2013, 07:23:03 PM »
I'm confused about the Ralth rule. He allows 4ac per 500 is present?

Rath is only in 1500pt+ fleets and adds +2 to the launch cap limit.

Offline Dragon Lord

  • Active Member
  • *
  • Posts: 37
Re: BFG:R Vote 60: Battlefleet Bakka Launch Restriction
« Reply #8 on: March 28, 2013, 11:52:16 PM »
I tend to think the AC restriction could be better implemented by restricting access to the carriers themselves rather than a direct launch bay limit.  Same end result I suppose though.

Offline Tyberius

  • Active Member
  • *
  • Posts: 61
Re: BFG:R Vote 60: Battlefleet Bakka Launch Restriction
« Reply #9 on: March 29, 2013, 02:43:12 AM »
I don't agree to artificially limit launch bays on any fleet  I vote NO

not in bakka not ever.....

bakka's outcome is yet to happen... the fleet will auto limit its AC in a natural and uncomplicated way...so no need for this...


Offline afterimagedan

  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 1899
    • Loc: Chicago IL, USA
Re: BFG:R Vote 60: Battlefleet Bakka Launch Restriction
« Reply #10 on: March 29, 2013, 02:51:18 AM »
It won't be limited enough with the Enforcer and Jovian passing. I don't want to rehash this Tyberius, so I won't continue to argue with you. Sig and I are trying to let the argument go, so please don't bring it back up with a post like that.
« Last Edit: March 29, 2013, 02:54:32 AM by afterimagedan »

Offline horizon

  • Moderator
  • Veteran member
  • *
  • Posts: 3868
  • Destiny Infinity Eternity
Re: BFG:R Vote 60: Battlefleet Bakka Launch Restriction
« Reply #11 on: March 29, 2013, 06:24:46 AM »
Hey Dan,
but voting is almost equal (and I didn't vote), you really call the discussion closed?
I know you want to move on, that's cool, it is in a way your protocols and call. Just say it is your decision to implement that way and done with it.

Offline afterimagedan

  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 1899
    • Loc: Chicago IL, USA
Re: BFG:R Vote 60: Battlefleet Bakka Launch Restriction
« Reply #12 on: March 29, 2013, 06:42:58 AM »
Um, ok so I'm a little confused here. I am trying to end the discussion because we have been publicly reprimanded for arguing as intensely as we have been. That's why I am asking for the discussion to be over with. People can keep talking if they want; I'm not going to be a dictator. Don't I have the right as a board member, like everyone else, to ask for a discussion to be over with? I just felt like even with all this reprimand and me obviously trying to pull away from a debate with Sig, it was sort of crappy of Tyberius to burst into it again with such a potent post. I am not against him saying anything, but that post needed a response.

Offline horizon

  • Moderator
  • Veteran member
  • *
  • Posts: 3868
  • Destiny Infinity Eternity
Re: BFG:R Vote 60: Battlefleet Bakka Launch Restriction
« Reply #13 on: March 29, 2013, 06:45:13 AM »
Shall we close this paticular voting thread then? All Bakka threads? The committee started its work.

Offline afterimagedan

  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 1899
    • Loc: Chicago IL, USA
Re: BFG:R Vote 60: Battlefleet Bakka Launch Restriction
« Reply #14 on: March 29, 2013, 06:49:36 AM »
Leave them be. It may turn out that the committee's work isn't accepted, then we need these.

Also, since most people are on the same page with two lists, I am hoping to committee will be willing to work on the board so that everyone gets their voice heard on this.